The decision to invest in an architectural metal roof system is based on many factors, not the least of which are beauty, durability and sustainability.
Maximizing the performance and value of architectural metal roof systems
What may be overlooked, or possibly underappreciated, is the importance and choice of roof underlayment and how it can impact the safety, efficacy and life cycle cost of the roofing assembly. Hidden below the beauty of architectural metal, underlayment is not just the final line of defense against water infiltration but is integral to the performance of the overall roofing system.
At its most basic, an underlayment is defined as a water-resistant barrier attached directly to the roof deck and lies beneath all other roof elements, including the metal cladding. There are several products on the market that can achieve this, but most often, basic is simply not good enough. At its best the choice of underlayment is constructed to not only provide true waterproofing protection but to also perform within the high-temperature environment of a metal system. The roof underlayment is also a critical part of a roof’s fire rating as it ensures maximum protection from fire penetration and may offer burning-ember resistance.
Construction and Science
The construction and science of the underlayment must provide no less than the following core elements of weather, heat resistance and safety. Known as nail sealability, underlayment should be tested and rated to protect the building from water infiltration in spite of fasteners used which may pierce the membrane. Any selected underlayment should be designed and tested to meet minimum standards of elongation, tear resistance and adhesion as laid out in ASTM D1970. The formulation of the compounds and other components used to produce the underlayment should be independently tested to withstand the high temperature environment often associated with a metal roof assembly—at a minimum of 240 F, and with premium products as high as 265 F. As important as the performance of an underlayment when considering its construction is contractor safety and product walkability. Surface film or finishing should provide at least a minimum slip resistance and grip which allows the contractor to work safely and efficiently.
Historically, underlayments have been mechanically fastened or part of a multilayer bonded assembly, but as a result of advancements in self-adhered technology, there are now self-adhered products that perform exceptionally well in a metal roofing environment, which are no longer installed with torches, hot asphalt, messy cold adhesives or other risk-based application methods.
Self-adhered products are simple peel-and-stick type applications that only need periodic hidden back-nailing. These technological advancements offer options for superior products to those allowed by the building code—increasing performance and efficiency for both the building owner and installers.
National and local building codes are often updated to serve as a model to provide guidelines for regulating building (and roofing) practices. These codes are intended to protect life, provide for environmental sustainability, fire safety and protection against natural forces, which can impact the integrity of a roof and building structure. The choice of underlayment is critical in meeting these requirements in the most cost-effective way possible. In certain localities it is mandatory that the metal roof assembly meet a minimum of Class A fire rating as tested under UL 790 while for some building owners it simply provides peace of mind.
For many in wildfire-prone areas of the country, the added security of a system—which is tested to be burning-ember resistant—may be a local requirement such as areas regulated by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Approved products are also often regulated locally, such as high-wind products in hurricane zones such as Miami-Dade County Product Approvals, the Texas Department of Insurance, or fire safety as part of the Cal-Fire Building Material Lists. These ratings or approvals should also be carefully considered as part of the underlayment decision in certain regions. Underestimating the importance of the underlayment for the safety, efficiency and life cycle costs of a structure with an architectural metal roof assembly may lead to undermining the value of the investment.
Although cost may be a factor, when considering the overall investment of an architectural metal roof assembly selecting a premium underlayment may be a very small price to pay to ensure the best possible product for your client and their building or home.
Scott Lelling is director of strategic marketing at Polyglass USA Inc., Deerfield Beach, Fla. Polyglass employees, Steven C. Wadding, corporate projects manager; Marco Sieber, national products manager; Maury Alpert, codes and compliance manager; and Joana Peralta, principal scientist; assisted him with column. To learn more, visit www.polyglass.us or call (954) 233-1432.